October 26th, 2009 03:51pm

Drug testing for high school athletes

by padecky

Sometime in the next couple weeks I am going to do a column on drug testing for high school athletes. Good or bad? I was so sure it would be a good thing. Texas does it, although I am not sure I would like to use Texas as a standard for many things.

Still, I was fairly convinced drug testing would bring more good than harm. and then I talked to Paul Cronin, Newman’s football coach, before the Montgomery game last Friday. He said he would vote against it.

“You would be sending the wrong message to kids,” Cronin said. “You would be telling them you aren’t trusting them. Coaches and parents can do a lot, just by noticing any changes in behavior.”

I’m still more convinced than not that drug testing would work but Cronin did give me something to think about.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • email
  • RSS
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Category Uncategorized

Comments

9 Comments

  1. October 26th, 2009 4:29 pm

    I have been informed by many Newman kids that drug use is rampart at their school and kids on the team take steroids. Of course high school coaches would be against it because it could effect their players. I do not want my son to ever think it is OK to take steroids to get ahead in sports but unfortunately many kids believe it is the only option to get ahead and stay ahead.

    by concerned parent


  2. October 26th, 2009 7:05 pm

    Well from the looks of it they are shutting down all the sports teams due to budget concerns, so theres no need to drug test them. besides thats an added cost.

    by Dan Flores


  3. October 26th, 2009 7:43 pm

    It would be okay with me to see drug testing in high school for athletics. It needs to start somewhere. Sports have no room for illegal drugs. I feel if illegal drugs are used in athletics it will only escalate later on in life.

    by B, Kozlowski


  4. October 26th, 2009 7:48 pm

    Hello,

    I think they should do testing for high school athletes. It would be pretty good for the team they want to be in, and helps out the school.

    by Lorena


  5. October 26th, 2009 8:57 pm

    I want to remind you that we are dealing with minors. How many times has a minor died on a football field or a basketball court and how many times has it been drug related and could have been avoided. They have to take physicals so why not drug tests. It is our responsibility to keep all the kids on a team safe and a start would be to make sure everyone is sober.

    by Rory Flood


  6. October 26th, 2009 10:56 pm

    Hmmmm, this is a good debate question. I do believe athletes should be tested but only for performance enhancers, unless you include the rest of the student body for all illegal drugs. I am also in favor of this and that it should be used as a toll to be able to counsel and educate those involved about the long term dangers of drug abuse. Drug abuse from Marijuana to other hard drugs are a major concern on campuses today and need to be dealt with by more than parents.

    by John H


  7. October 27th, 2009 5:27 am

    Test, but as John says only for performance enhancers, there are enough indicators for when a kid starts taking drugs. Common sense. It strikes me as hysterical to run around and drug test everyone. Fear based and unnecessary. Common sense folks.

    by annette


  8. October 31st, 2009 5:08 pm

    RE: concerned parent
    I can assure you that drug use at Cardinal Newman is in fact much less than in your average public school. But it’s a high school! What do you honestly expect? And how dare you accuse Coach Cronin or any other coach for that matter of being against drug tests because they are concerned about losing star players. Might I remind you that most high school coaches, like Cronin, work at the school as teachers, and therefore have much more noble intentions toward their kids and players that merely whether they are eligible to play on Friday night. I firmly believe that drug tests would be a waste of time because they would find precious few athletes on performance enhancers. Kids should be educated about the harmfulness of drugs in general, not policed.

    by Newman Student


  9. October 31st, 2009 8:50 pm

    concerned parent, steroids are probably the least used substance in high school. I think its logical, just by common sense, that there are an even amount, if not more students at the public schools in Santa Rosa take performance enhancers than at Cardinal Newman.
    Dan made a good point about the budget costs but I think it would be a good idea to test for steroids in high school athletes. Make sure the field is fair.

    by student athlete


Submit Your Comments

Required

Required, will not be published